Re: [Full-disclosure] [OT] Obama said: "American people understand that not everybody's been following the rules"

[xD 0x41 <secn3t@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hai!
Nothing but, that guy makes it look like, a bad anything,wherver he goes..
lol.
I suggest, dont say ANYTHING unless it is atleast ON TOPIC, be an adult, and
stop being such a rude dude,or ppl will just ignore.
Anyhow, no all jokes aside, please, be adult, and stop the abuse, or just
plain nastiness when challenging anothers opinion.
this, is extremely frustrating when trying to also answer or, just read a
decent list... LAately, ive seen wayy to much on this *nigger* and *obama*
craps, I hope it ends about now.
I do not think, terrorism/sitins/wall street and, any of the other things
todo with that whole thread, is anything useful, and, sofar all im doing, is
trashing them emails rather than usually i read, when i see the topic or any
of the little offtopic sidethreads,once again inspired by nonsense, and, non
adult childish acts of simply being *rude* to others, and then not expecting
it, in return.Welcome to RealLife buddy!
I suggest making filter for [OT]: and maybe setting it as protocol..
because, this topic is Nothing todo with FD, IT , nor, do i see many people
who give a damn, and, other newbies, like myself..have to read garbage, wich
has nothing atall todo with whats going on , now, in our real world, where,
there is somuch more IT sec news atm, why be talking about obama bin barak
when you could be talking about, angelina jollie and, immaculate breasts!
thats a better [OT]: , so, out of all the phone hax scandals, Im shocked
NOTHING about it has come to FD lists yet... anyone, sharing pics :P coz,
really, i aint joking but there is ALOT of now public wich were one DEFNOT
public,photos and even claims that, many are actually real.. not by actual
staements but, i see suings so, some of them, are really tue...when here we
probably were thinking , many were cropshots and adjusted photchops.. I am
amazed at howmany women, and men, like to take picks of theyre .. pinkish
bits.
Aalot of plain nudeshots by boyfriends takling snaps on the GF phone, then
transferring to theyre phone ... hehe.. makes sens, take picture on gf
phone, gf feels like "ok no1 else will see but me and him" , then, they
forgt that theyre using a VERY smartphone, to smart for them even!
Alas, there goes those pics, transferred with all the latest tech gadgets,
that makesure it simply takes even random pics, and sends to a websigte, i
mean,how secure are phones when, android are still vulnerable to complete
ext4 partition handling errors/d0s and local root escalation...after what,
2yrs of it being news.... Then, they complain when people make use of
basically a *google* in some cases, picking the right words to show
images/cams, and, thats just online GHD stuff wich is now very old news.

Nowdays It seems phones are overlooked,yet are huge in itsec now, and ipads
are also, being owned.. and, i could easily proove this on any one range,
just scannning vnc port 5900, and watch the amount of macs, thats because
they have still not updated the vnc packge enough to be blocked by scanners,
and, from there your sitting in the server in viewer-vnc.
Ohwell.I will be looking at the recent scandals, alot of them and, one is
very hot model miranda kerr (Orlando bloom's wife i believe).
She was owned, now allegedly many many others, also have been targetted in
simply UDP bluetooth hacks and wifi range hacks.. wich is very clever, as
one picture, could be worth somuch as the News of The World (packer
empire-ex)
Id love accesss to theyre db ;p~
cheers,
xd

ps wtf was this about again... o ye.. that obama guy..


On 15 October 2011 11:32, Laurelai <laurelai@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  On 10/14/2011 6:32 PM, xD 0x41 wrote:
>
> Cristiano , per favor' mi dai dieci minuti scusa mi ma, e' essentiale ..
> You really dont realise how much, you attack others when they post,
> NOMATTER what the topic... yet you are still wondering why somany people
> seem to despise your skinny little nerdy ass... well, nerdy isnt bad, but,
> your a downright lookalike for mr.Bean aka rowan atkinson. You could maybe
> do his stunts, to ?
> Your the one who is usually abusing others, before the finality wich is
> simply adults not reesponding, to the baby whos crying out for more
> aarguements.
> You should stfu, and learn more, you assume to know all, in every post,
> your the brain, yet you are lame, i looked everything up abiout you, and
> yes, go ahead, and setup a nice wordpress secure setting, php wise to,  then
> yes, id maybe hink your atleast a halfwit ;)
> Anyhow, your basically a tr0ll, and, you seem to keep goading, even AFTER
> the others, have completely stopped responding to you, simply because,
> Laurelai was right, why would anyone want to keep up a thread wich has now
> turned malign, as i forsaw a week ago, but, i did not think it would even
> make a week, People like you, keep inspiring the flame to burn brighter..
> wich to me, is nastier than any *abuse* names, wich, you clearly have not
> counted howmany times you have actually called others, some form of rude
> name/word/personal attack.
> Maybe when you GROW UP, and behave as an adult, then I would assume the
> list will start to hear you, even through the bs.
> Anyhow, i applaud you, for *coming out* as to say, I mean, putting your pic
> up, like that, mate, you could be a pornstar! what you doin online
> :P~~~bahahaha
> go back to grade.2 then repeate it, then move on... then, if you work out
> how to call 911, call someone who gives a shit.
> Idiotic kid, grow the hell up.
> xd--
>
> // IND SEC CONSILTANT FOR Yep yep Security (simply coz it sounds good) YEP
> YEP for all your Hat attire needs!
>
> On 15 October 2011 08:57, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, let's just all ignore low insults. The world would be a much better
>> place without them and whoever said them in the first place...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Laurelai <laurelai@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>   On 10/14/2011 2:25 PM, Christian Sciberras wrote:
>>>
>>> Resorting to personal attacks? Nice.
>>>
>>>  Technical skills in what? Running a wordpress blog? Defacing a website?
>>> Growing pot?
>>>
>>>  I rarely publicise any materials, most of the time I just tell whoever
>>> is responsible to do a fix.
>>> I'm not really running after publicity, unlike you guys.
>>> Also note that I never said I'm a seasoned hacker... in fact, my
>>> occupation is quite on the opposite side of the spectrum...
>>>
>>>  You also seem to know more than I do what the Ubuntu VM I have
>>> contains.
>>>
>>>  But that must make all the difference! I mean, people that don't know
>>> qubits from bits shouldn't be allowed in such discussions
>>> (of course there's wikipedia...)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Georgi Guninski 
>>> <guninski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Christian Sciberras,
>>>>
>>>> I have trouble judging your technical skills - all I have seen is bad
>>>> smalltalk.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have any technical publications you can share so I can judge?
>>>>
>>>> btw, the best i found was you could could reproduce a bug in a CMS and
>>>> in addition you can't tell root from user password on vanilla ubuntu.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> joro
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 02:11:13AM +0200, Christian Sciberras wrote:
>>>> > > So if they cause damage for profit that makes it ok?
>>>> >
>>>> > No. But it's certainly better than doing damage without profit. Making
>>>> > profit means that at the end of the day, the money's going to go
>>>> somewhere
>>>> > further in the chain.
>>>> > Flattening a tower, for instance, or attacking the local bank that
>>>> refused
>>>> > to give you a loan because of the time you spent in a cell, isn't as
>>>> > productive.
>>>> > Neither is it making a company loose clients/profit just because they
>>>> > decided they don't want you to use their services (as if you did have
>>>> a
>>>> > right in the first place...).
>>>> >
>>>> > > And yes I acknowledge the American public has a measure of
>>>> responsibility
>>>> > in the situation too, human beings are by nature imperfect, but the
>>>> largest
>>>> > share of responsibility lies with the names listed below.
>>>> >
>>>> > The largest share? I can see Ex-president Bush trying to sell you a
>>>> bottle
>>>> > of beer for $10 dollars ($7 profit). Wait, I can't.
>>>> >
>>>> > > That sort of thing has happened to me and I paid back every dime of
>>>> it,
>>>> > most people are decent human beings and would do the same.
>>>> >
>>>> > Most people? I could have sworn 90% of the people in the NYC subway
>>>> would
>>>> > thank $deity if you suddenly dropped dead so they could get things off
>>>> you.
>>>> > Call me cynical, but I wouldn't trust anyone else in such cases, other
>>>> than
>>>> > myself.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Regarding that list of yours, great! Now we just need a little more
>>>> effort.
>>>> > For each of those persons, please enlighten us as to what they did
>>>> legally
>>>> > wrong.
>>>> > Of course, the people that landed in jail shouldn't be counted. The
>>>> "99%
>>>> > protest" is a modern one committed to change, it just can't right
>>>> wrongs by
>>>> > pointing at jailed people.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Laurelai <laurelai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > >  On 10/13/2011 9:18 AM, Christian Sciberras wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I simply acknowledge the fact that some people work hard to get
>>>> "obscenely
>>>> > > rich", but I just can't stand people that cause damage for the fun
>>>> of it.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >  So if they cause damage for profit that makes it ok?
>>>> > >
>>>> > >  Yes, I stick for everyone that minds his business, instead of
>>>> ruining
>>>> > > others' for the fun of it.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >  What bothers me is the fact that those hypocrites (protesters) are
>>>> crying
>>>> > > out loud against some people they're highly envious of with the
>>>> excuse of
>>>> > > "the depression".
>>>> > > Well, here's the news; the famous depression has been brought about
>>>> by
>>>> > > these same people!
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > And yes I acknowledge the American public has a measure of
>>>> responsibility
>>>> > > in the situation too, human beings are by nature imperfect, but the
>>>> largest
>>>> > > share of responsibility lies with the names listed below.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >  If someone above is collecting free money because of incentives for
>>>> > > people to spend money (and which seem to work well), I can't blame
>>>> him.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >  Yes because trickle down theory worked *so* well
>>>> > >
>>>> > >  How many times in your life have you paid back something you
>>>> received by
>>>> > > mistake and which wasn't yours?
>>>> > > While I would foremost applaud anyone that would right such a wrong,
>>>> I just
>>>> > > can't ignore the fact that those people out there representing the
>>>> "99%" are
>>>> > > big-time hypocrites.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > That sort of thing has happened to me and I paid back every dime of
>>>> it,
>>>> > > most people are decent human beings and would do the same.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >  On a different argument, since you seem to know well enough how
>>>> some of
>>>> > > the 1% are doing immoral things, why don't you start by handing out
>>>> names
>>>> > > instead of talking air just as the "99%" crowd has been doing up
>>>> till now?
>>>> > >
>>>>  > > *Alan Greenspan, chairman of US Federal Reserve 1987- 2006
>>>> > > **Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England
>>>> > > **Bill Clinton, former US president*
>>>> > > *Gordon Brown, prime minister*
>>>> > > *George W Bush, former US president*
>>>> > > *Senator Phil Gramm
>>>> > > **Abby Cohen, Goldman Sachs chief US strategist
>>>> > > **Kathleen Corbet, former CEO, Standard & Poor's
>>>> > > **"Hank" Greenberg, AIG insurance group
>>>> > > **Andy Hornby, former HBOS boss
>>>> > > **Steve Crawshaw, former B&B boss
>>>> > > **Adam Applegarth, former Northern Rock boss
>>>> > > **Dick Fuld, Lehman Brothers chief executive
>>>> > > **Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin
>>>> > > **Lewis Ranieri
>>>> > > **Joseph Cassano, AIG Financial Products
>>>> > > **Chuck Prince, former Citi boss
>>>> > > **Angelo Mozilo, Countrywide Financial
>>>> > > **Stan O'Neal, former boss of Merrill Lynch*
>>>> > > *Jimmy Cayne, former Bear Stearns boss
>>>> > > **Christopher Dodd, chairman, Senate banking committee (Democrat)
>>>> > > **Geir Haarde, Icelandic prime minister
>>>> > > **John Tiner, FSA chief executive, 2003-07*
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Oh yeah and lets not forget about this guy
>>>> > >
>>>> http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1877351_1877350_1877337,00.html
>>>> > > And while he is thankfully spending time in a prison cell, so many
>>>> other
>>>> > > names on this list go free, in fact a good chunk of them made a
>>>> profit off
>>>> > > of the disaster.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>>
>>>>  > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>  Lets keep the discussion above the belt guys ok?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>  Whats wrong with being skinny? *ducks*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/