[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] [OT] Obama said: "American people understand that not everybody's been following the rules"



On 10/14/2011 6:32 PM, xD 0x41 wrote:
Cristiano , per favor' mi dai dieci minuti scusa mi ma, e' essentiale ..
You really dont realise how much, you attack others when they post, NOMATTER what the topic... yet you are still wondering why somany people seem to despise your skinny little nerdy ass... well, nerdy isnt bad, but, your a downright lookalike for mr.Bean aka rowan atkinson. You could maybe do his stunts, to ? Your the one who is usually abusing others, before the finality wich is simply adults not reesponding, to the baby whos crying out for more aarguements. You should stfu, and learn more, you assume to know all, in every post, your the brain, yet you are lame, i looked everything up abiout you, and yes, go ahead, and setup a nice wordpress secure setting, php wise to, then yes, id maybe hink your atleast a halfwit ;) Anyhow, your basically a tr0ll, and, you seem to keep goading, even AFTER the others, have completely stopped responding to you, simply because, Laurelai was right, why would anyone want to keep up a thread wich has now turned malign, as i forsaw a week ago, but, i did not think it would even make a week, People like you, keep inspiring the flame to burn brighter.. wich to me, is nastier than any *abuse* names, wich, you clearly have not counted howmany times you have actually called others, some form of rude name/word/personal attack. Maybe when you GROW UP, and behave as an adult, then I would assume the list will start to hear you, even through the bs. Anyhow, i applaud you, for *coming out* as to say, I mean, putting your pic up, like that, mate, you could be a pornstar! what you doin online :P~~~bahahaha go back to grade.2 then repeate it, then move on... then, if you work out how to call 911, call someone who gives a shit.
Idiotic kid, grow the hell up.
xd--

// IND SEC CONSILTANT FOR Yep yep Security (simply coz it sounds good) YEP YEP for all your Hat attire needs!

On 15 October 2011 08:57, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:uuf6429@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    Yeah, let's just all ignore low insults. The world would be a much
    better place without them and whoever said them in the first place...








    On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Laurelai <laurelai@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:laurelai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

        On 10/14/2011 2:25 PM, Christian Sciberras wrote:
        Resorting to personal attacks? Nice.

        Technical skills in what? Running a wordpress blog? Defacing
        a website? Growing pot?

        I rarely publicise any materials, most of the time I just
        tell whoever is responsible to do a fix.
        I'm not really running after publicity, unlike you guys.
        Also note that I never said I'm a seasoned hacker... in fact,
        my occupation is quite on the opposite side of the spectrum...

        You also seem to know more than I do what the Ubuntu VM I
        have contains.

        But that must make all the difference! I mean, people that
        don't know qubits from bits shouldn't be allowed in such
        discussions
        (of course there's wikipedia...)




        On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Georgi Guninski
        <guninski@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:guninski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

            Christian Sciberras,

            I have trouble judging your technical skills - all I have
            seen is bad smalltalk.

            Do you have any technical publications you can share so I
            can judge?

            btw, the best i found was you could could reproduce a bug
            in a CMS and in addition you can't tell root from user
            password on vanilla ubuntu.

            --
            joro

            On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 02:11:13AM +0200, Christian
            Sciberras wrote:
            > > So if they cause damage for profit that makes it ok?
            >
            > No. But it's certainly better than doing damage without
            profit. Making
            > profit means that at the end of the day, the money's
            going to go somewhere
            > further in the chain.
            > Flattening a tower, for instance, or attacking the
            local bank that refused
            > to give you a loan because of the time you spent in a
            cell, isn't as
            > productive.
            > Neither is it making a company loose clients/profit
            just because they
            > decided they don't want you to use their services (as
            if you did have a
            > right in the first place...).
            >
            > > And yes I acknowledge the American public has a
            measure of responsibility
            > in the situation too, human beings are by nature
            imperfect, but the largest
            > share of responsibility lies with the names listed below.
            >
            > The largest share? I can see Ex-president Bush trying
            to sell you a bottle
            > of beer for $10 dollars ($7 profit). Wait, I can't.
            >
            > > That sort of thing has happened to me and I paid back
            every dime of it,
            > most people are decent human beings and would do the same.
            >
            > Most people? I could have sworn 90% of the people in
            the NYC subway would
            > thank $deity if you suddenly dropped dead so they could
            get things off you.
            > Call me cynical, but I wouldn't trust anyone else in
            such cases, other than
            > myself.
            >
            >
            > Regarding that list of yours, great! Now we just need a
            little more effort.
            > For each of those persons, please enlighten us as to
            what they did legally
            > wrong.
            > Of course, the people that landed in jail shouldn't be
            counted. The "99%
            > protest" is a modern one committed to change, it just
            can't right wrongs by
            > pointing at jailed people.
            >
            >
            >
            >
            > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Laurelai
            <laurelai@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:laurelai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
            >
            > >  On 10/13/2011 9:18 AM, Christian Sciberras wrote:
            > >
            > > I simply acknowledge the fact that some people work
            hard to get "obscenely
            > > rich", but I just can't stand people that cause
            damage for the fun of it.
            > >
            > >  So if they cause damage for profit that makes it ok?
            > >
            > >  Yes, I stick for everyone that minds his business,
            instead of ruining
            > > others' for the fun of it.
            > >
            > >  What bothers me is the fact that those hypocrites
            (protesters) are crying
            > > out loud against some people they're highly envious
            of with the excuse of
            > > "the depression".
            > > Well, here's the news; the famous depression has been
            brought about by
            > > these same people!
            > >
            > >
            > > And yes I acknowledge the American public has a
            measure of responsibility
            > > in the situation too, human beings are by nature
            imperfect, but the largest
            > > share of responsibility lies with the names listed below.
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >  If someone above is collecting free money because of
            incentives for
            > > people to spend money (and which seem to work well),
            I can't blame him.
            > >
            > >  Yes because trickle down theory worked *so* well
            > >
            > >  How many times in your life have you paid back
            something you received by
            > > mistake and which wasn't yours?
            > > While I would foremost applaud anyone that would
            right such a wrong, I just
            > > can't ignore the fact that those people out there
            representing the "99%" are
            > > big-time hypocrites.
            > >
            > > That sort of thing has happened to me and I paid back
            every dime of it,
            > > most people are decent human beings and would do the
            same.
            > >
            > >
            > >  On a different argument, since you seem to know well
            enough how some of
            > > the 1% are doing immoral things, why don't you start
            by handing out names
            > > instead of talking air just as the "99%" crowd has
            been doing up till now?
            > >
            > > *Alan Greenspan, chairman of US Federal Reserve 1987-
            2006
            > > **Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England
            > > **Bill Clinton, former US president*
            > > *Gordon Brown, prime minister*
            > > *George W Bush, former US president*
            > > *Senator Phil Gramm
            > > **Abby Cohen, Goldman Sachs chief US strategist
            > > **Kathleen Corbet, former CEO, Standard & Poor's
            > > **"Hank" Greenberg, AIG insurance group
            > > **Andy Hornby, former HBOS boss
            > > **Steve Crawshaw, former B&B boss
            > > **Adam Applegarth, former Northern Rock boss
            > > **Dick Fuld, Lehman Brothers chief executive
            > > **Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin
            > > **Lewis Ranieri
            > > **Joseph Cassano, AIG Financial Products
            > > **Chuck Prince, former Citi boss
            > > **Angelo Mozilo, Countrywide Financial
            > > **Stan O'Neal, former boss of Merrill Lynch*
            > > *Jimmy Cayne, former Bear Stearns boss
            > > **Christopher Dodd, chairman, Senate banking
            committee (Democrat)
            > > **Geir Haarde, Icelandic prime minister
            > > **John Tiner, FSA chief executive, 2003-07*
            > >
            > >
            > > Oh yeah and lets not forget about this guy
            > >
            
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1877351_1877350_1877337,00.html
            > > And while he is thankfully spending time in a prison
            cell, so many other
            > > names on this list go free, in fact a good chunk of
            them made a profit off
            > > of the disaster.
            > >
            > >
            > >

            > _______________________________________________
            > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
            > Charter:
            http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
            > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/



        Lets keep the discussion above the belt guys ok?



    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
    Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/




_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Whats wrong with being skinny? *ducks*
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/