[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] MySQL 5.1/5.5 WiNDOWS REMOTE R00T (mysqljackpot)
- To: noloader@xxxxxxxxx, full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] MySQL 5.1/5.5 WiNDOWS REMOTE R00T (mysqljackpot)
- From: Rajesh Malepati <chittoor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 02:09:04 +0530
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:03 AM, king cope
> <isowarez.isowarez.isowarez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yes I agree, we should discard this default remote vulnerability
> > because it is documented.
> Devil's advocate: Does a questionable design choice/feature that is
> documented make it any less vulnerable?
Looks like someone's sarcasm detector is broken.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/