[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] MySQL 5.1/5.5 WiNDOWS REMOTE R00T (mysqljackpot)
- To: Rajesh Malepati <chittoor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] MySQL 5.1/5.5 WiNDOWS REMOTE R00T (mysqljackpot)
- From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 15:41:12 -0500
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Rajesh Malepati <chittoor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:03 AM, king cope
>> <isowarez.isowarez.isowarez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Yes I agree, we should discard this default remote vulnerability
>> > because it is documented.
>> Devil's advocate: Does a questionable design choice/feature that is
>> documented make it any less vulnerable?
>
> Looks like someone's sarcasm detector is broken.
Doh, I'm used to him being more serious......
Sorry about the extra chatter.
Jeff
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/