On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:48:33 -0400, Ian Hayes said: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:40 PM, andrew.wallace > <andrew.wallace@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:43 PM, <valdis.kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> One could equally well read that as "We're fed up and about to > >> pound North Korea even further back into the Stone Age". > > > > With Stuxnet, it was lucky nobody was seriously injured. > > > > You cannot condone such weapons Valdis, or your hat will start to turn grey, > > black. > > Stuxnet may not have killed anyone, but several Iranian nuclear > scientists were assassinated in conjunction with Stuxnet's release. Please don't feed the troll - the only way he can post to full-disclosure is if somebody quotes him in. The worst part is that Andrew's reading comprehension is as good as always - I wasn't commenting on Stuxnet, but the move of naval forces to the Pacific. China isn't the only reason we might want a naval task force over there. And I never said I condoned it, merely pointed out alternate interpretations. The funny thing is that Andrew was going on for a *long* time that there is no such thing as cyber-warfare - when in fact it was going on while he was denying it.
Attachment:
pgp6T9lZrzlf1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/