Re: [Full-disclosure] Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default

[xD 0x41 <secn3t@xxxxxxxxx>]

Already 2 conflicting answers,abit of confusion i might say....  this
is exactly why it should be ONE flippin binary.




On 20 November 2011 06:54, Dan Kaminsky <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Er, sudo bash gives you /dev/kmem, access to the hard drive block device...
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 19, 2011, at 11:44 AM, james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Effective user id as a short answer; compare sudo whoami and su - whoami
>>
>>
>> Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dan Kaminsky <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:36:47
>> To: james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Johan Nestaas<johannestaas@xxxxxxxxx>; 
>> full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
>>  Olivier<feuille@xxxxxxxxxx>; 
>> full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default
>>
>> What is the security differential between su and sudo bash?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Nov 19, 2011, at 6:15 AM, james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>> I'll second that; the isp I work at has a sizeable ubuntu customer base and 
>>> these are customers who have made an informed decision.
>>>
>>> Now; let's consider ubuntu's inherited security from debian such as 
>>> configuring a 'mortal account' (admittedly can be ignored in the preseed) 
>>> and then the lack of perms on su; must use sudo.
>>>
>>> This is a distro that is newbie friendly but is not designed specifically 
>>> for them.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, though, you make a distro with simplified tasks (printer 
>>> installation a fantastic example) and people, especially long term 
>>> linuxers- though I ought to be included I guess, remember back all too 
>>> easily to when everything was an uphill struggle: "what do you mean I don't 
>>> have to compile this as a flipping module? That's not freedom!" Being all 
>>> too familiar.
>>>
>>> Just my tuppence worth anyway.
>>>
>>> Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Johan Nestaas <johannestaas@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sender: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:04:46
>>> To: Olivier<feuille@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/