Re: [Full-disclosure] [OT] Obama said: "American people understand that not everybody's been following the rules"

[Mike Hale <eyeronic.design@xxxxxxxxx>]

Obviously not.

Again.  They looked like they had weapons.  The pilots weren't
wondering...they were sure they saw weapons.

They then engaged what appeared to be a clear threat to other US
forces nearby.

The pilots acted exactly as they should have, given the information
presented to them.  This was a war zone, not a country club.

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Mike Hale <eyeronic.design@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Except that they weren't obviously unarmed.
>>
>> Not only where they not obviously unarmed, they appeared to be armed.
>>
>> Look at the 4 minute mark.
>>
>> That sure as shit looks like an RPG.
>>
>> The crew thought the group was armed.  Ergo, they were cleared to engage.
>>
>> This wasn't a war crime...and the allegation that it was just makes
>> people look ridiculous.
> Listen to yourself: we weren't sure if they were armed, so we killed
> them. Put yourself and your family in the shoes of the dead folks. Its
> not a comfortable place to be, is it?
>
> Jeff
>
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:05 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:44:44 PDT, Mike Hale said:
>>>> Seriously!  Think about the injustice of having American helicopters
>>>> engage armed individuals shadowing American soldiers.
>>>
>>> Shooting at "armed individuals" is one thing.  If it's "civilians and 
>>> Reuters
>>> employees" who *aren't* obviously armed, it's something else.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
>>
>



-- 
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/