[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit Fake or not?
- To: <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit Fake or not?
- From: the nlhcrew <thecr3w@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:42:11 +0200
it's real, this is what lulzsec use to hack all sites
no wait, that was havij
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:58:42 +0200
From: decoder@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit Fake or
not?
On 06/16/2011 05:23 PM, Andrew Farmer wrote:
> On 2011-06-15, at 12:59, kernel wrote:
>> Hi, all,
>> Some days ago I found head -n * of exploit for apache at patebin.com
>> http://pastebin.com/XEFnG9D6
>>
>>
>> #!/usr/bin/perl
>> #
>> # Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit
>> #
>> # This 0-day exploit will remotely gain root on any apache server from
>> version 2.0.63 to 2.2.19
Claiming to gain root through a service that most people do not run as
root already makes me think that this fake.
Best,
Chris
>> # Beta release 2.3.12-beta was also compromised by an affiliate - need
>> verification...
> The header looks like a crude modification of this 2003 DAV exploit:
>
> http://www.exploit-db.com/download/38/
>
> There's also a glaring syntax error on line 22 of the pastebin code. It'd
> never run as written.
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/