[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit Fake or not?



On 06/16/2011 05:23 PM, Andrew Farmer wrote:
> On 2011-06-15, at 12:59, kernel wrote:
>> Hi, all,
>> Some days ago I found head -n * of exploit for apache at patebin.com
>> http://pastebin.com/XEFnG9D6
>>
>>
>> #!/usr/bin/perl
>> #
>> # Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit
>> #
>> # This 0-day exploit will remotely gain root on any apache server from
>> version 2.0.63 to 2.2.19

Claiming to gain root through a service that most people do not run as
root already makes me think that this fake.


Best,

Chris


>> # Beta release 2.3.12-beta was also compromised by an affiliate - need
>> verification...
> The header looks like a crude modification of this 2003 DAV exploit:
>
> http://www.exploit-db.com/download/38/
>
> There's also a glaring syntax error on line 22 of the pastebin code. It'd 
> never run as written.
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/