[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Getting Off the Patch
- To: "Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx" <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Getting Off the Patch
- From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:49:22 +0000
>No, I'm taking the position that "most people" are in fact solely relying
>on patching because they are clueless and they wouldn't even be patching at
>all if auto-update wasn't turned on. (And Cal caught on what I meant in his
>reply - that there's two very disjoint communities).
>
>And that changes the calculus of "best practices" - what's "best" at a shop
>that has thousands of managed nodes and a staff of dozens of experienced
>sysadmins is different from a shop that has dozens of machines and one
>semi-clued guy with a McSE. (We'll leave home machines out of the equation
>for now - it's safe to assume that *those* machines the operating system
>has to take steps to protect itself, including auto-patching, because the
>user won't do it).
My mistake then - I shouldn't have inferred your position from previous thread
subject matter.
>And that's something I've noticed is lacking from much of the discussion -
>the business case for deploying something. Sure, something might well be
>more secure, but unless the added security is worth more than the added
>cost, time, and effort, it's actually a bad idea to deploy.
This is precisely what I asked for several times and never received. When the
idea was presented, it indicated a serious deficiency of any depth of knowledge
just around security and engineering, not to mention the requirements for dev,
legal and compliance. Being the kind-hearted and generous type of person I am,
I assumed that I was missing something, and that there would be an opportunity
to review some sort of qualifying data. There isn't any, so I reverted back to
my original position.
I don't always agree with your viewpoints, but I know that there is always
merit to your position that I should take into account. Not that you care or
need my approval or agreement, but thanks for the clarification.
t
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/