[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Getting Off the Patch
- To: Zach C <fxchip@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Getting Off the Patch
- From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:01:15 +0000
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Zach C [mailto:fxchip@xxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 12:31 PM
>To: Thor (Hammer of God)
>Cc: lists@xxxxxxxxxx; Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx; phocean; full-
>disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Getting Off the Patch
>
>Just on top of this, I would like to ask a question of Pete in the form of an
>example.
>Just on top of this, I would like to ask a question of Pete in the form of an
>example.
Excellent example. I'd like to also throw one in that has network connectivity
consequences. Regarding SQL Slammer - what would have given 100% protection
from Slammer. Outside of the obvious ones like firewalls and such which are
already deployed. That's a "real life" example, and I'm interesting in what
controls would have already been in place.
t
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/