Re: [Full-disclosure] NiX - Linux Brute Forcer (the beast) has been released!]]

[nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

> Le vendredi 12 novembre 2010 Ã  21:47 +0200, nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx a
> écrit :
>> Where is for example FORM auto-detection for those
>> other tools? Where is SOCKS4 proxy support? Where is proxy
>> randomization?
>> Where is logic to drop dead proxies? Where is logic for
>> fake-detection?
>
> Then, you should have started by that, it is that simple.
> We are all busy and you can't expect anyone to even have a look on your
> tool or link if you don't highlight how different it is from others or
> why you did it.
>
> As far as I am concerned, these features may be nice, but I don't need
> them and will stick to Medusa for the brute force tests I run from time
> to time (ie not often, a few times a year at most).
> But, to make it clear, it is just my personal opinion, I am not saying
> that your tool is not interesting or useless.
>
>

If you read the first post i did regarding NiX:
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Nov/115

It is listing the features. I can understand everyone is busy as i am as
well. If you take a look at similar windows tools, none of those have an
SSL support and pretty much them all are unreliable, that´s why i wanted
to come up with more powerful solution.

I am not saysing Hydras´s etc. are bad tools, I usually can make custom
features regardless of a tool made.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/