[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] NiX - Linux Brute Forcer (the beast) has been released!]]
- To: nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] NiX - Linux Brute Forcer (the beast) has been released!]]
- From: phocean <news@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:56:52 +0100
Le vendredi 12 novembre 2010 à 21:47 +0200, nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx a
écrit :
> Where is for example FORM auto-detection for those
> other tools? Where is SOCKS4 proxy support? Where is proxy
> randomization?
> Where is logic to drop dead proxies? Where is logic for
> fake-detection?
Then, you should have started by that, it is that simple.
We are all busy and you can't expect anyone to even have a look on your
tool or link if you don't highlight how different it is from others or
why you did it.
As far as I am concerned, these features may be nice, but I don't need
them and will stick to Medusa for the brute force tests I run from time
to time (ie not often, a few times a year at most).
But, to make it clear, it is just my personal opinion, I am not saying
that your tool is not interesting or useless.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/