[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Nmap NOT VULNERABLE to Windows DLL Hijacking Vulnerability
- To: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Nmap NOT VULNERABLE to Windows DLL Hijacking Vulnerability
- From: Nikhil Mittal <nikhil_uitrgpv@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:16:35 +0530 (IST)
>>Here's my definition
>>Exploitable vulnerability = vulnerability
>>Non-exploitable "vulnerability" = mental masturbation
Nice definition. I would like to add one more line for my definition
Inability to recognize a straight forward vulnerability = mentally handicap
Nikhil Mittal
--- On Fri, 10/9/10, Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Nmap NOT VULNERABLE to Windows DLL Hijacking
Vulnerability
To: "Nikhil Mittal" <nikhil_uitrgpv@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Fyodor" <fyodor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, 10 September, 2010, 4:23 AM
> Please, try to figure out the difference b/w exploitability and vulnerability.
Here's my definition
Exploitable vulnerability = vulnerability
Non-exploitable "vulnerability" = mental masturbation
HTH,
/mz
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/