[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] Nmap NOT VULNERABLE to Windows DLL Hijacking Vulnerability

To: Nikhil Mittal <nikhil_uitrgpv@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Nmap NOT VULNERABLE to Windows DLL Hijacking Vulnerability
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:53:57 -0700

> Please, try to figure out the difference b/w exploitability and vulnerability.

Here's my definition

Exploitable vulnerability = vulnerability
Non-exploitable "vulnerability" = mental masturbation

HTH,
/mz

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Nmap NOT VULNERABLE to Windows DLL Hijacking Vulnerability
  - From: Nikhil Mittal

References:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Nmap NOT VULNERABLE to Windows DLL Hijacking Vulnerability
  - From: Nikhil Mittal

Prev by Date: [Full-disclosure] [ MDVSA-2010:172 ] kernel
Next by Date: [Full-disclosure] Adobe Flash Player IE version 10.1.x Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll)
Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Nmap NOT VULNERABLE to Windows DLL Hijacking Vulnerability
Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Nmap NOT VULNERABLE to Windows DLL Hijacking Vulnerability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread