Re: [Full-disclosure] SMS Banking

["Thor (Hammer of God)" <Thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

*ME* stop trying to weasel?  Wow.  At least you'll have a shot at comedy when 
this is over.

Answer my questions, "Dr."  as posted.  Include the system YOU said YOU would 
set up.  Include that if it gets breached ANY WAY I WANT within 6 months that 
you will pay me $100,000.

Is that simple enough for you?  Is there any part of that that one can deem as 
"weaseling?"   Product the freaking contract already and stop wasting our time.

t

From: Craig S. Wright [mailto:craig.wright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:51 AM
To: Thor (Hammer of God); Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
Cc: pen-test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'full-disclosure'; 
security-basics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] SMS Banking

Tim,
You stated "You are officially "on." " to my challenge.

I am arranging a contract. An attorney has been arranged for both the contract 
and the escrow.  This will take a number of days.

The amount has upped and there are a couple other aspects, but the initial 
framework holds. Stop trying to weasel.

Regards,
...
Dr. Craig S Wright<http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/> GSE-Malware, 
GSE-Compliance, LLM, & ...
Information Defense<http://www.information-defense.com/> Pty Ltd


From: Thor (Hammer of God) [mailto:Thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 3:59 PM
To: craig.wright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
Cc: pen-test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'full-disclosure'; 
security-basics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] SMS Banking

Now you're talking.  But first let's work up an actual contract.  Neither of 
your components define anything.  When you say that you are going to predict 
"risk" with your  magic formula, do you mean if the software has 
vulnerabilities?   That it can be hacked, or will be hacked?

Be sure to define this properly and definitively - if you end up saying that a 
system has a 1% change of being hacked, and I (or my auditors) hack it, would 
you claim you were "right"?  I question if you can even define the parameters 
of this bet, much less apply your formulas, but we'll see.

I also want to know what "scale" you plan to use.  So far, even though I've 
asked, you've not provided what the "answer" to your formula is, or how it will 
be applied.   I'm assuming, unless you are going to change your tune which I 
wouldn't doubt, that you won't look at the software code or threat models, but 
rather apply your formulas.  I further assume that the "loser" will be 
financially responsible for the "audits" done my way.

I'm more than happy to take your money, and I look forward to doing so.    
Since one of your masters degrees is in law, I'm assuming you can clearly 
define the terms of the contract.    I will, of course, insist upon a contract, 
and I hope you won't mind that I have my own attorney look it over.    I'm not 
immediately trusting of the competence of one with a doctorate degree and 
multiple masters degrees who can't spell "technology" or "experience" correctly 
on his on-line CV.

You are officially "on."  And I'm looking forward to it.

t



From: Craig S. Wright [mailto:craig.wright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 7:41 PM
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx; Thor (Hammer of God)
Cc: pen-test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'full-disclosure'; 
security-basics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] SMS Banking


I have a simple answer to this. Forget the debate, rhetoric is not a scientific 
method of determining truth.

"Thor" wants a challenge, let's have one - a real one and not one based on 
verbalisations, abuse and unfounded assertions.

I suggest two components;

1       A selection of software products are tested using both processes, that 
is I use a model for the risk of these products, and "Thor" can make up 
whatever guesses he wishes. We model (or "Thor" guesses, pulls from a hat...) 
the vulnerabilities over a time period. The number of bugs in software as well 
as the risk are to be presented as a monthly estimate.

2       We model a few systems (say 50). We can use Honeypots (real systems set 
to log all activity without interference) run by an independent party to each 
of us. I use probabilistic models to calculate the risk. "Thor" does whatever 
he wants.

Each of the predictions is published by all parties. The one who is most 
accurate wins. Fairly simple?

I will even give a handicap to "Thor", I will offer to predict within a 95% 
confidence interval and that for me to win, at least 90 of the 100 software 
products and 45 of the 50 systems have to lie within my predicted range that I 
calculate and release. "Thor" has to simply guess better than I do no matter 
how far out he is.

I will put up $10,000 Au for my side. Let's see if "Thor" has something real to 
offer.

Regards,

...

Dr. Craig S Wright<http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/> GSE-Malware, 
GSE-Compliance, LLM, & ...

Information Defense<http://www.information-defense.com/> Pty Ltd


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/