[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] [Fwd: Re: windows future]
- To: Peter Besenbruch <prb@xxxxxxxx>, "full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [Fwd: Re: windows future]
- From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:30:26 -0300
> On Friday 28 August 2009 08:29:48 Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:
> > Maybe I'm not saying it properly... (and I won't belabor the point
> > anymore). If you want a password instead of a click, then set it to
> > "prompt for credentials" rather than "prompt for consent" for
> > *administrators*.
>
> Understood. I also understand you can set up Vista to use normal users.
> My
> objection is to Microsoft's default behavior.
This now makes more sense after further reading the following from you:
>
> > > We basically agree on the main point: Separate user and
> administrator
> > > accounts are better. I wonder if Micosoft will start enforcing
> that?
> >
> > The "wonder if MSFT will start enforcing that" is already answered -
> they
> > do, and HAVE been. Even with XP you could "run as administrator." I
> used
> > to do it all the time. I actually like the UAC in Vista/Win7 better
> as it
> > gives seamless admin capabilities while interactively logged on as a
> normal
> > user.
>
> There is a difference between being able to do something, and enforcing
> it.
> The OS on my machines will not allow a person to run an administrative
> desktop. It enforces the separation between the administrator and a
> normal
> user by requiring the creation of at least one normal user at install.
> Only
> that normal user can log in.
Oh, now that's cool. I didn't know that. The "force to create a normal user
and only use that" was not something I was aware of.
What's the OS? So, even if you wanted to, you couldn't log on as administrator
and just do whatever you needed to? I'm not sure if I like that, but I assume
this is customizable behavior, yes?
> Microsoft encourages the opposite behavior
> by
> default. I know of no Vista home user who runs as a normal user.
>
> I guess it's good we had this conversation; I got to meet someone who
> sets up
> Windows properly on his personal machines. ;)
Absolutely - and I learned something about other default options on other OS's
too ;)
t
>
> --
> Hawaiian Astronomical Society: http://www.hawastsoc.org
> HAS Deepsky Atlas: http://www.hawastsoc.org/deepsky
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/