Re: [Full-disclosure] Linux's unofficial security-through-coverup policy

["Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman" <buanzo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
| Similar reasoning applies to almost all uses of Linux in the embedded
| world - if you already have code running on the cell phone, there really
| isn't *anything* you can do by abusing something like the setldt() bug
| that you couldn't *already* do to the box.

I so agree! :) - It reminds me of an argentina group that released an 
"advisory" about a root
exploit... that required root privileges to be exploitable. I LOLed (and was 
embarrassed, too, I'm
an argentine) for a week.

- --
Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman
Independent Linux and Security Consultant - SANS - OISSG - OWASP
http://www.buanzo.com.ar/pro/eng.html
Mailing List Archives at http://archiver.mailfighter.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIfmy7AlpOsGhXcE0RCi41AJ48aEeDDCVH2ueY/9DGa3KmcCEaQgCfUmDN
TSAb2cS0yc+jv7McBoIwe0I=
=WmQg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/