On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:48:41 BST, Ian stuart Turnbull said: > Ha Ha. Yes, not a proper fiend hey. But I take it that I would be anonymous > technically. Nope. Hint - if you send a packet *out* from the shell account, it's probably as a result of another packet going *in* to the shell account. Even the stupidest of cops can figure out that "wow - every time a packet heads out from here to the Pentagon, a split second before, a similar packet came in from some bozo on a cablemodem in Idaho. Maybe the Idaho guys need to pay this guy a visit".... Yes, you can obfuscate it with setting cron jobs and tunnelling data via covert channels and other neat tricks, but the basic point remains - if you connect *to* the shell, you're no longer anonymous, and if you don't connect to the shell, you can't use the shell....
Attachment:
pgp1JxKU82Mg5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/