Re: [Full-disclosure] Open Letter on the Interpretation of "Vulnerability Statistics"

[Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

* Georgi Guninski:

> so you approve gaining pseudo credibility by practicing mouse copy/paste?
>
> then this pseudo credibility leads to corporate serving/licking like:
> "responsible disclosure rfc" - search for it.
>
> not than coley is consistent at all (besides lacking completeness):
> http://www.cve.mitre.org/board/archives/2002-02/msg00026.html
> -------------------
> - The Board has agreed that CNAs should not reserve candidates for
>   people who do not practice responsible disclosure (candidates would
>   be assigned *after* publication).  I hope that this document, or a
>   later version, will become part of the "definition" of responsible
>   disclosure.
> -------------------

Yes, this puzzles me too, but on the other hand, Debian became a CNA,
and Debian's official policy is geared away from "responsible
disclosure" -- all bug reports are supposed to be public.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/