[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Open Letter on the Interpretation of "Vulnerability Statistics"
- To: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Open Letter on the Interpretation of "Vulnerability Statistics"
- From: Georgi Guninski <guninski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 17:48:58 +0200
so you approve gaining pseudo credibility by practicing mouse copy/paste?
then this pseudo credibility leads to corporate serving/licking like:
"responsible disclosure rfc" - search for it.
not than coley is consistent at all (besides lacking completeness):
http://www.cve.mitre.org/board/archives/2002-02/msg00026.html
-------------------
- The Board has agreed that CNAs should not reserve candidates for
people who do not practice responsible disclosure (candidates would
be assigned *after* publication). I hope that this document, or a
later version, will become part of the "definition" of responsible
disclosure.
-------------------
--
where do you want bill gates to go today?
<end_of_message>
junk
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/