Okay.
Jamie
let me put it this way. if you break the law to rescue people noone would bitch about it.
that always happens that people bend the rules to rescue people.
thats perfectly fine but invading someones privacy is something different.
the usa can invade any other country, but refuses to "invade" one of their own states for the
only purpose to help its people without weapons but food? thats redicilous. the usa got so much
power under their ass, but you want to tell me that the gov cant do anything if one of its states
refuses help ? if the gov really would have wanted they could have helped.
well at least you seem to agree on that this is wrong.
And had he done that, the liberals would very likely now be asking whether or not it was legal for him to have done so. For the people that hate President Bush, nothing he does or does not do will be acceptable. It's as simple as that.
sure, but if he would have done that it would be way less people bitching.
the whole world would have seen bush or the u.s gov cares so much about their peoples
lifes and safety that they bend the rules in order to protect them. for once bush could
have had a good picture in the world media. so while you would have a handfull that
hate bush anyways arguing about the law (which wouldnt help them as the u.s. court wouldnt listen),
you now got the whole world asking why the fuck they didnt react and tons of american people
who feel left alone. i feel sorry for those poor americans. soon your rights will be all gone
because 'It's just a goddamned piece of paper' no ?
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/