Re: [Full-disclosure] a call for full-disclosure to become a moderatedlist

[wac <waldoalvarez00@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi:

I beleive that such moderated version should be given as an alternative when
people subscribe to this list. I mean in the webpage or in the help mail. I
also don't want this one to be moderated and I feel just fine with the
messages sent but if anyone wants it filtered... Well why not, they have
their rights and who knows If some day I feel that I need it maybe I switch.
Who knows?

Regards
Waldo

On 12/16/05, James Longstreet <jlongs2@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 16, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Michael Evanchik wrote:
>
> > I second this
>
> There's no point discussing it, or holding it to a vote.  The purpose
> of this list is to be unmoderated.  The list owner has stated over
> and over that that is the one point he will not concede on.
>
> Kurt Seifried, among others, runs a moderated version of this list.
> I can't vouch for its quality, since I'm not really interested in the
> list being moderated.  If you want moderation, look elsewhere.  If
> you don't want someone else moderating the list, learn about filters,
> or even your 'D' key.
>
> Calling for full-disclosure to be moderated is pointless and is
> wearing out my 'D' key.
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/