[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] a call for full-disclosure to become a moderatedlist
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] a call for full-disclosure to become a moderatedlist
- From: James Longstreet <jlongs2@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:52:06 -0600
On Dec 16, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Michael Evanchik wrote:
I second this
There's no point discussing it, or holding it to a vote. The purpose
of this list is to be unmoderated. The list owner has stated over
and over that that is the one point he will not concede on.
Kurt Seifried, among others, runs a moderated version of this list.
I can't vouch for its quality, since I'm not really interested in the
list being moderated. If you want moderation, look elsewhere. If
you don't want someone else moderating the list, learn about filters,
or even your 'D' key.
Calling for full-disclosure to be moderated is pointless and is
wearing out my 'D' key.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/