Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial CiscoSecurity Presentation

[Georgi Guninski <guninski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 03:19:47PM +0000, DAN MORRILL wrote:
> >From what I understand (I am writing a major paper on Intellectual 
> >Property 
> Protection right now, the Joy of being a student) the creator of the data 
> has the direct right under Title 17 and the DMCA to determine how the data 
> will be used (hence expiring CDR's and DRM).
> 
> If data is sent in error that does not limit or otherwise reduce the rights 
> of the data owner, and the data owner can request that the data be removed. 
> The data owner can also request assurances that the data has been removed 
> from all parties that they believe have copies of that data. Cisco in their 
> message has acted according to American law by requesting that all copies 
> of the data that is held in private hands be deleted as they are the acting 
> IP owners along with ISS. Cisco is acting as the agent of the IP owner 
> (much like RIAA and MPAA do for artists and movie makers).
> 
> Their request is quite legal, and at least they were polite about it.
>

oh, the first puppy on this thread iirc.

can you broadcast your message to outside usa jurisdiction, preferably via
paid commercials?

-- 
where do you want bill gates to go today?


 
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/