Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation

[Daniel <deeper@xxxxxxxxx>]

This raises an interesting point, if intellectual property is sent in
error, do any of the laws pertaining to said property apply 100% or is
there a weird shift of how they are applied?





On 7/29/05, Russell Smoak <rsmoak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> All,
> 
> These recipients received an email from Austin Mckinley as Cisco Systems.
> 
> This messasge was sent in complete error and includes intellectual
> property of ISS and Cisco Systems.  Please delete and do not distrbute
> the information any further.
> 
> If you have any quesitons, please contact the Cisco PSIRT team.
> 
> 
> Thank you for your cooperation.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Russell Smoak  <rsmoak@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sr. Manager, PSIRT
> Customer Assurance Programs
> c i s c o S y s t e m s
> Phone: 615-791-0972
> Cell: 615-545-6473
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/