[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail)

To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail)
From: Michael Williamson <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:30:24 -0500

I agree, but you'd be surprised how often it is used as such...
I think this really applies to any network firewall that allows for
outbound ssh.

> Possibly because NAT isn't a security mechanism.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

References:
- [Full-Disclosure] Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail)
  - From: Abe Usher
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail)
  - From: Barrie Dempster
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail)
  - From: michael williamson
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail)
  - From: zeedo

Prev by Date: [Full-Disclosure] RE: How to Break Windows XP SP2 + Internet Explorer 6 SP2
Next by Date: [Full-Disclosure] Buffer-overflow in Age of Sail II 1.04.151
Previous by thread: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail)
Next by thread: [Full-Disclosure] How to Break Windows XP SP2 + Internet Explorer 6 SP2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread