On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 07:34 -0500, michael williamson wrote: <snip> > This sure does demonstrate > how _useless_ NAT really is for security. Possibly because NAT isn't a security mechanism. -- Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue http://www.bsrf.org.uk [ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver www.keyserver.net 0xD82BDB6F ]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part