[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is farsuperior
- To: ald2003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is farsuperior
- From: Darren Reed <avalon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:02:18 +1000 (Australia/ACT)
> You gotta be more specific than FW-1. FW-1 can run over a large number
> of OS. You can get FW-1 for WinNT, Solaris, Linux, BSD . Each has the
> strengths and weaknesses of the underlying OS. Also FW-1 can run on a
> large number of hardware platforms, PCI, Compact-PCI, Sparc, etc. Each
> has it's strengths and weaknesses.
I couldn't find the original for this in my inbox but the poster is wrong.
For details on what platforms FW-1 is really supported on, see this
document:
http://www.checkpoint.com/products/downloads/firewall-1_datasheet.pdf
Darren
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html