[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is farsuperior
- To: "Gary E. Miller" <gem@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Edward W. Ray" <support@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is farsuperior
- From: "Aditya, ALD [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ]" <aditya.deshmukh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 06:54:56 +0530
> You gotta be more specific than FW-1. FW-1 can run over a large number
> of OS. You can get FW-1 for WinNT, Solaris, Linux, BSD . Each has the
> strengths and weaknesses of the underlying OS. Also FW-1 can run on a
> large number of hardware platforms, PCI, Compact-PCI, Sparc, etc. Each
> has it's strengths and weaknesses.
now you are talking, if you are using BSD how about using Openbsd with the
paket filter ?
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ
éb½êÞvë"? axZÞx÷«²?Ú?Gb¶*'¡ó?[kj¯ðÃæj)mªÿr?ÿ
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html