Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: USB risks (continued)

["Sam" <Sam@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I tested it but it will only work when the user has admin rights.
With a normal user it will not work because it cannot change properties of
users or make a new user.

Sam


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "RSnake" <rsnake@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Chris Withers" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Gadi Evron" <ge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Harlan Carvey"
<keydet89@xxxxxxxxx>; <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: USB risks (continued)


>
> Of course it's not.  That's just Microsoft's explination.  There's no
> good reason, just a vague distinction.  My only point is that it isn't a
> reliable attack vector, unlike an onboard CDROMs (the media, not the
device
> must be removable).  Here is how Microsoft defines it on their usbfaq page
> (sorry, the links are broken, I just cut and pasted from
> http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/device/storage/usbfaq.mspx):
>
> Q: What must I do to trigger Autorun on my USB storage device?
> If you need to make a USB storage device that executes Autorun, the
following
> two conditions must both be true:
>
> . Media must be marked as removable.
>
> . The device can be set to either static or removable.
>
> We associate the "removable" nature of a device with the bus that it
resides
> on. This means that a disk on an Integrated Device Electronics (IDE) or
SCSI
> bus would be considered fixed, whereas a disk on a USB or IEEE 1394 bus
would
> be regarded as removable by default. PnP uses a bit in the
DEVICE_CAPABILITIES
> structure to determine this. For more information, see the
DEVICE_CAPABILITIES
> Plug and Play Structure in the Windows DDK, located at
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/kmarch/hh/kmarch/k112_22r6.asp.
>
> The "removable" nature of media is a property of the device. For example,
in
> the case of a CD-ROM or a ZIP drive, the medium can be removed without the
> device itself going away, but on the other hand the medium and the disk
cannot
> be separated on static storage PC cards. We obtain this information by
using
> the StorageDeviceProperty request. For more information, see the
> STORAGE_DEVICE_DESCRIPTOR Storage Structure in the Windows DDK, located at
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/storage/hh/storage/k306_00qa.asp.
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Chris Withers wrote:
>
> | Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:59:11 +0100
> | From: Chris Withers <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | To: RSnake <rsnake@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | Cc: Gadi Evron <ge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> |      Harlan Carvey <keydet89@xxxxxxxxx>,
full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> |      bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: USB risks (continued)
> |
> | RSnake wrote:
> | > writeable, but the drives aren't removeable on CDs.  That of course
isn't true
> | > if you have a USB drive, but I think part of the deal there is that
you need to
> | > install special drivers to even read USB CD drives.
> |
> | ...that's not true ;-)
> |
> | Chris
> |
> | --
> | Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
> |             - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
> |
> | _______________________________________________
> | Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> | Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> |
>
> -R
>
> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to
> this email by anyone else is unauthorized.  If you are not the
> intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any
> action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is
> expressly prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html