[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Full-Disclosure] Apology: Was Multiple Scanning Engines
- To: <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Apology: Was Multiple Scanning Engines
- From: "RandallM" <randallm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:54:59 -0500
I do sincerely apologize for offending those who felt this was not the place
to
ask such a question. I felt though that there was no better place then a
place
where the recipients were of high caliber and knowledge. A Google search
would
have only given me advertisements of "We're the best" type. For those who
through
kindness answered I thank you so much.
--__--__--
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:29:38 +1200
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] multiple scanning engines
To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: Personal account
"RandallM" <randallm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I looking for something that can utilize multiple scanning engines to
> place above our mail servers. Any suggestions?
Precisely how is this a security vulnerability disclosure issue?
Securityfocus has a focus-virus list and there are many other fora
around the web for discussing "whose antivirus is best" type issues...
Please, no-one else reply to this _on list_.
--
Nick FitzGerald
Computer Virus Consulting Ltd.
Ph/FAX: +64 3 3529854
--__--__--
thank you
Randall M
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html