[Full-Disclosure] Re: Support the Sasser-author fund started

[Charlie Harvey <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

| I don't really see any question of ethics, morals, or legality here.  The
| burgaler is at fault.  Said intruder may not be guilty of theft, and may
| have had "pure" motives, but they're still plainly guilty of Tresspass and
| Breaking and Entering. 

But trespass is only a civil offence and not a criminal one (in the UK 
anyhow) and breaking and entering is not in itself a crime, only a 
constituent part of burglary - you'd also have to prove intent to 
steal. So you could sue him/her, but strictly speaking no criminal act 
has occured...  

Sorry to be a pedantiscist.

Charlie

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html