[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Talk in #grsecurity
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Talk in #grsecurity
- From: Dave Aitel <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:22:55 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Joshua Brindle wrote:
|
| So I ask grsecurity fans, why would you run the software of someone
| no better than the people trying to crack your machine? This is
| not responsible behaviour and shows a clear disregard for security
| and safety of others.
|
Whatever. It shows a clear disregard for people using half-solutions
which don't work. This is normal behavior. The fact is that grsecurity
is a hundred times better then the alternatives - and anyone using the
alternatives has made some sort of comprimise that leaves them open to
attack, and probably already knows it.
- -dave
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAZJ8vzOrqAtg8JS8RAsABAJ9qjky3R90wRGrNIF1iZxqiDJ/L4ACdGIvO
xOLzWTRu6Yv3qxspq9csKL8=
=rBXh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html