Re: [Full-Disclosure] Talk in #grsecurity

[Joshua Brindle <method@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I was there and the conversation most certainly happened, in fact you 
can see when i joined in the pasted converstation.

The reason the conversation was posted is because this is full 
disclosure where I assume at least the majority of people actually 
believe in full disclosure and people keeping vulnerabilities secret 
isn't exactly kosher. This in particular is what i'm refering to

[22:40] <BlackNet> how many do you have that's not released?
[22:41] <spender> 2 for exec-shield
[22:41] <spender> 3 for systrace
[22:41] <spender> 1 for DTE
[22:41] <spender> ~10 for LIDS
[22:42] <BlackNet> that's alot
[22:42] <spender> oh
[22:42] <spender> 3 i think for linsec
[22:43] <BlackNet> all of these are non-reported?
[22:43] <spender> correct

So I ask grsecurity fans, why would you run the software of someone no 
better than the people trying to crack your machine? This is not 
responsible behaviour and shows a clear disregard for security and 
safety of others.

Joshua Brindle


andrewg@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> The point of the previous post was to point out that people shouldn't
> believe anything posted until other people in the conversation agree that
> it happened and/or make a statement about it.
>
> --> http://www.angelfire.com/electronic/bodhidharma/mu.html
>
>
> > Just to let everyone know I am awaiting these exploits
> > to be released to the respected parties in due time or an apology for
> > falsifying these claims.
> >
> > Ed
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html