[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] A new TCP/IP blind data injection technique?
- To: Michael Gale <michael@bluesuperman.com>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] A new TCP/IP blind data injection technique?
- From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@ghettot.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:17:54 +0100 (CET)
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Michael Gale wrote:
> Well first of all, one of the industry leading firewalls ( BorderWare
> Firewall Server ) does NOT pass fragmented packets.
What I was asking for, is whether you have any further information about
this? Or is it just the way you have it configured? I would be surprised
if this is a default for commercial production-grade firewalls, as it may
- quite simply - prevent some people from communicating with you in some
situations. Most commercial firewall vendors go as far as disabling PMTUD
just to avoid this.
> I have a rule at the beginning: iptables -A INPUT -f -j DROP
Ok - this is a very specific configuration, then. On most sane firewalls,
it is not necessary to drop fragments (and, quite frankly, not
particularly wise, either) - the firewall will simply reassemble all
traffic before forwarding it any further (this is something you suggested
is going to be implemented for BorderWare, and a functionality present for
long years on systems like Linux)..
Cheers,
--
------------------------- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --
Michal Zalewski * [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx]
Did you know that clones never use mirrors?
--------------------------- 2003-12-15 19:05 --
http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/photo/current/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html