Re: [Full-Disclosure] A new TCP/IP blind data injection technique?

[Michael Gale <michael@bluesuperman.com>]

Hello,

        Well first of all, one of the industry leading firewalls (
BorderWare Firewall Server ) does NOT pass fragmented packets.

Also netfilter / iptables has the following optio:

       [!]  -f, --fragment
              This means that the rule only refers to second and further
fragments of fragmented packets.  Since              there  is  no  way
to tell the source or destination ports of such a packet (or ICMP type),
such a              packet will not match any rules which specify them. 
When the "!" argument precedes the "-f" flag,              the rule will
only match head fragments, or unfragmented packets.

I have a rule at the beginning:
iptables -A INPUT -f -j DROP

So all my firewall boxes and any I have setup for other companies DROP
fragmented packets.

Michael.



On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 10:24:55 +0100 (CET)
Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@ghettot.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Michael Gale wrote:
> 
> > Well then .. I am happy that non of the firewalls I use accept or
> > pass fragments packets.
> 
> I would be willing to assume you are confused. Can you provide any
> references that would confirm this observation?
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --
>  Michal Zalewski * [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx]
>     Did you know that clones never use mirrors?
> --------------------------- 2003-12-14 10:24 --
> 
>    http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/photo/current/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html