[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] EULA
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] EULA
- From: "Gregory A. Gilliss" <ggilliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:12:32 -0700
Okay, this is from my girlfriend, so flame her if it's wrong :-)
Basically, a HIPAA compliant hospital/practice/etc. that is found to be
in violation of, say, the regs on software change control, can be fined
up to US$ 10,000 per violation. I would guess that tha *could* be construed
as "per personal computer" if they wanted to be dicks about it...
But, it gets better...if they hospital/practice/etc that has been
inspected and cited doesn't comply with the violated HIPAA regs,
they can be closed down. BAM! In practice I do not think that this has
happened (yet) because the whole HIPAA thing is so new. However if you
look at it from the security perspective, I expect that M$ legal will be
amending their existing EULA for health care providers as soon as they read
about this...
G
On or about 2003.09.09 14:08:04 +0000, David Hayes (david.hayes@xxxxxxx) said:
> So, if a HIPAA site uses Windows and accepts the SP3 EULA, they're
> screwed. If a HIPAA site uses Windows and does not accept the SP3
> EULA, they're screwed.
>
> Logical conclusion, if a HIPAA site uses Windows, they're screwed.
> Thus they should use a different OS?
>
> --
> David Hayes Network Security Operations Center MCI Network Svcs
> email: david.hayes@xxxxxxx vnet: 777-7236 voice: 972-729-7236
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:13:21PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> > On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 08:43:14 PDT, D B <geggam692000@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> >
> > > does the EULA of Microsoft violate lawyer client
> > > privilege ..... as in if my lawyer is using windows
> > > is he violating my rights
> >
> > I can't speak for the legal profession, but the SP3 EULA (the one where you
> > agree to
> > allow Microsoft to install, without warning or notification, anything
> > labeled a "security
> > patch", even if it breaks 3rd party software), is known to be very bad mojo
> > for sites
> > covered by HIPPA, because it cedes software change control.
> >
> > Of course, if you fail to agree to the EULA and you're a HIPPA site, you're
> > still screwed
> > because then you can't install post-SP3 patches.
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
--
Gregory A. Gilliss Telephone: 1 650 872 2420
Computer Engineering E-mail: greg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Computer Security ICQ: 123710561
Software Development WWW: http://www.gilliss.com/greg/
PGP Key fingerprint 2F 0B 70 AE 5F 8E 71 7A 2D 86 52 BA B7 83 D9 B4 14 0E 8C A3
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html