Re: [Full-Disclosure] EULA

[David Hayes <david.hayes@xxxxxxx>]

So, if a HIPAA site uses Windows and accepts the SP3 EULA, they're
screwed.  If a HIPAA site uses Windows and does not accept the SP3
EULA, they're screwed.

Logical conclusion, if a HIPAA site uses Windows, they're screwed.
Thus they should use a different OS?

-- 
David Hayes    Network Security Operations Center     MCI Network Svcs
email: david.hayes@xxxxxxx      vnet: 777-7236     voice: 972-729-7236


On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:13:21PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 08:43:14 PDT, D B <geggam692000@xxxxxxxxx>  said:
> 
> > does the EULA of microsoft violate lawyer client
> > privilege ..... as in  if my lawyer is using windows
> > is he violating my rights 
> 
> I can't speak for the legal profession, but the SP3 EULA (the one where you 
> agree to
> allow Microsoft to install, without warning or notification, anything 
> labelled a "security
> patch", even if it breaks 3rd party software), is known to be very bad mojo 
> for sites
> covered by HIPPA, because it cedes software change control.
> 
> Of course, if you fail to agree to the EULA and you're a HIPPA site, you're 
> still screwed
> because then you can't install post-SP3 patches.
> 


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html