Re: [Full-Disclosure] [ GLSA 200501-46 ] ClamAV: Multiple issues

[exon <exon@xxxxxxx>]

Trog wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 14:41 -0800, Dack wrote:
>
> > > > By sending a base64 encoded image file in a URL an attacker could evade
> > > > virus scanning.
> > >
> > > It's somewhat harsh to single out ClamAV for this issue. AFAICT, the
> > > only two virus scanners that do currently protect against this are
> >
> > What mail clients, if any, would execute a virus encoded in this manner?
> > Is this a gaping hole in other mail anti-virus systems, or do most
> > clients just ignore this kind of data?
>
>
> I really haven't tested mail clients, but Thunderbird would be the most
> likely.

Nopes. Thunderbird, being a client designed to run under a plethora of 
platforms, doesn't bother with executing code at all unless explicitly 
asked to. In my opinion that's one of its greatest feature.