[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FD] Multiple banks - potential risk of an inconsequent client separation
- To: Poyo VL via Fulldisclosure <fulldisclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [FD] Multiple banks - potential risk of an inconsequent client separation
- From: Tim Schughart <t.schughart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 14:48:15 +0200
Hello together,
as many of you already know some german banks are sharing the same hoster.
Via google dorking it is possible to determine some customers of one of those
hosters (Fiducia & GAD IT AG).
The hoster uses a GET parameter called „bankid“ to identify its customers.
For example:
https://mobilebanking.gad.de/inm/mobilgad////ptlweb/WebPortal?
<https://mobilebanking.gad.de/inm/mobilgad////ptlweb/WebPortal?bankid=8008>bankid=8008
<https://mobilebanking.gad.de/inm/mobilgad////ptlweb/WebPortal?bankid=8008>
With help of google dorking „inurl:WebPortal?bankid=„ it is possible to
enumerate all banks which host their online banking service at Fiducia & GAD IT
AG.
We checked this via whois on the ip net ranges - where another mistake is done
- net name „GAD“ in all whois records.
Another indicator for a shared environment (at least some shared systems) is
changing the banking id shown in the following example:
https://www.apobank.de/ptlweb/WebPortal?bankid=8008
<https://www.apobank.de/ptlweb/WebPortal?bankid=8008>
changed to:
https://www.apobank.de/ptlweb/WebPortal?bankid=8007
<https://www.apobank.de/ptlweb/WebPortal?bankid=8007>
redirects to https://www.vr.de/privatkunden.html
<https://www.vr.de/privatkunden.html>
In Germany and the EU it is given by law that you have to separate clients data
because, e.g. EU-DSGVO. For banks especially BAFIN audits this, too.
On the following link you’ll find a cleaned list of dork double results, where
are around 85 banks are listed with their bankid.
https://data.prosec-networks.com/d/7cf20ee4b17e44ccb402/?dl=1
<https://data.prosec-networks.com/d/7cf20ee4b17e44ccb402/?dl=1>
In our oppinion the separation is not given properly, what do you guys think
about this?
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Tim Schughart
CEO / Geschäftsführer
--
ProSec GmbH
Robert-Koch-Straße 1-9
56751 Polch
Website: https://www.prosec-networks.com
Phone: +49 (0)261 450 930 90
Sitz der Gesellschaft / company domiciled in: Polch
Registergericht / registry court: Amtsgericht Koblenz, HRB 26457
Geschäftsführer / chief executive: Tim Schughart
USt-IdNr./ VAT ID: DE321817516
“This E-Mail communication may contain CONFIDENTIAL, PRIVILEGED and/or LEGALLY
PROTECTED information and is intended only for the named recipient(s). Any
unauthorized use, dissemination, copying or forwarding is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email
communication in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it and
destroy all copies of this E-Mail.
“Diese E-Mail Mitteilung kann VERTRAULICHE, dem BERUFSGEHEIMNIS UNTERLIEGENDE
und/oder RECHTLICH GESCHÜTZTE Informationen enthalten und ist ausschließlich
für den/die genannten Adressaten bestimmt. Jede unbefugte Nutzung, Weitergabe,
Vervielfältigung oder Versendung ist strengstens verboten. Sollten Sie nicht
der angegebene Adressat sein und diese E-Mail Mitteilung irrtümlich erhalten
haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender, löschen diese E-Mail und
vernichten alle Kopien.
_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/