On 2014-09-25 09:14, Tony Arcieri wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:In what way? It doesn't have a logo, so it's a bit better in my book.That's where you're wrong: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ByVh24fCcAAy7mT.png
I propose a contest - IMO if Heartbleed got a cool logo/symbol, ShellShock deserves at least 4 or 5 designs to choose from.
http://www.beneaththewaves.net/ShellShock-With_Shockwaves-With_Text.JPG http://www.beneaththewaves.net/ShellShock-With_Shockwaves-Without_Text.JPG http://www.beneaththewaves.net/ShellShock-Without_Shockwaves-With_Text.JPG http://www.beneaththewaves.net/ShellShock-Without_Shockwaves-Without_Text.JPG Maybe MITRE can be convinced to add a "logo URL" field to CVE entries? :) _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/