[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FD] Public WiFi Pcaps
- To: fulldisclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [FD] Public WiFi Pcaps
- From: Bryan Bickford <bryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 12:37:39 -0400
Greetings,
I am starting some wifi research and had questions about the legality of
listening to unencrypted, public wifi data and publishing subsequent
research.
From what I understand, the wiretap act prohibits listening to
communications that were not configured to be readily accessible to the
general public. Specifically:
...permits "any person" to intercept an electronic communication made
through a system "that is configured so that . . . [the] communication is
readily accessible to the general public."
I have seen debates about whether an unencrypted access point (e.g.
starbucks) qualifies under this exception. Is there any concrete legal
precedent that defines this either way?
The only one I can think of is the google street view case, and they lost.
http://epic.org/privacy/streetview/
From a technical viewpoint, you are just reading unencrypted radio waves. I
see no technical reason that it's any different than listening to an FM
radio station.
Anyone else have more insight/experience?
_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/