[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [FD] Peeling the onion: Almost everyone involved in developing Tor was (or is) funded by the US government | PandoDaily
- To: "Ivan .Heca" <ivanhec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [FD] Peeling the onion: Almost everyone involved in developing Tor was (or is) funded by the US government | PandoDaily
- From: Stephen Crane <culda.rinon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:27:37 -0700
Tor was originally sponsored by the US Naval Research Lab. Does this
automatically mean it's backdoored then? Could someone insert a backdoor
into open-source software? Yes. Funding sources do little to change this.
Now, who is controlling exit nodes is a different story, but that's another
can of worms.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Ivan .Heca <ivanhec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Funding doubled, so engineering some back doors?
>
> In 2012, Tor nearly doubled its budget, taking in $2.2 million from
> Pentagon and intel-connected grants: $876,099 came from the DoD, $353,000
> from the State Department, $387,800 from IBB.
>
> That same year, Tor lined up an unknown amount funding from the
> Broadcasting Board of Governors to finance fast exit nodes.
>
> http://pando.com/2014/07/16/tor-spooks/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
> http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
> Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
>
_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/