Am 30.06.2014 01:38, schrieb Exibar: > I see a war a-brewing in our Macintosh area, they're pushing for AV > scanning on Write only... I'm pushing back, hard and winning so far.... > They don't seem to get it no matter how much they say they understand the > dangers, they're still stuck in the world where "Mac viruses just don't > exist", and apparently they don't care if they have a Windows virus dormant > on their machines either.... they claim they have a huge performance > improvement with scan on read turned off... It always comes back to > performance in their argument.... > > Does anyone have any white papers or any links or even any off the cuff > thoughts that I can bring to these folks that will help prove my point that > only having scan on write is a *very* bad idea and a huge security hole? easy - ask them what the scan of a download helps if it's executed later while due download there was no matching signature first comes the malware and then the signature to detect if the dumb folk scan only once while store the malware on a central fileserver that will greatly multiply damage everytime a client opens the file with no scanning again but if you are talk with Apple "the OS is secure" priests forget it, they are learning resistent
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/