Re: [FD] Legitimacy of new Heartbleed exploit?

[Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> It's bullshit. They say: 'A missing bounds check in the handling of the
> variable "DOPENSSL_NO_HEARTBEATS"'. That's not a variable, the "D" is
> not actually part of the name, and it's a compile-time macro that
> configures whether heartbeats will be compiled in or not. And because
> it's a compile-time thing, it's nothing that an attacker could ever
> influence.

That's what the NSA would say.

/mz

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/