On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 09:15:50AM -0700, Kristian Erik Hermansen wrote: > * Bank of the West does not seem to take security and privacy > seriously enough, as far as I can tell This goes for all banks and is probably one of the reasons most ATMs still run windows and are skimmable time after time by the simplest exploits. It's simply cheaper and easier to cover the losses and spin the news after an incident than to spend money on preventive security and research... They made the cost/benefit calculation eons ago, concluding this way is cheaper, and it obviously still proves. Probably goes for lots of other areas part from banking aswell. -- r mail raccoon at fripost.org xmpp && jabber.ccc.de gpg && 0x4B0EE1DC
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/