[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC
- To: TImbrahim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC
- From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:47:19 -0700
> Is this treated with the same way that says that Remote File Inclusion is not
> a security issue ?
I'm not sure how RFI came into play on this thread - the original
report wasn't about RFI.
I don't have an agenda here; I'm just trying to get to the bottom of
it and make sure that we converge on a common understanding of the
issue. As in any argument, it's fairly likely that one of us is wrong,
and I accept that it could very well be me - I have been wrong quite a
few times in my life, and it's always a valuable learning opportunity.
I think it's unfortunate that the thread has devolved into various
accusations and credential-slinging, because it reduces the likelihood
of such a productive outcome. Please feel free to ping me directly any
time, though - I'm happy to chat.
Cheers,
/mz
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/