[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] DoS via tables corruption in WordPress



I agree that the DoS part is vague and not a vulnerability in WordPress. 
However, my question would be:

* Will an error running a database statement lead to WordPress showing the 
install process to visitors?
* What additional privileges do they then have?
* Could this cause a non-exploitable db bug to become exploitable?

If the answers there lean towards yes, lots and yes, then some mitigation is 
called for.


Sent from Samsung Mobile

-------- Original message --------
From: Andrew Nacin <nacin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Date:  
To: MustLive <mustlive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Cc: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] DoS via tables corruption in WordPress 
 
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:02 AM, MustLive <mustlive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is DoS vulnerability in WordPress, <snip>

As pointed out by others, this is unbearably vague.

But it's also invalid.

Your "attack" requires that a maintenance script to repair tables is left open 
for anyone to access. The constant that you point out must be set, 
WP_ALLOW_REPAIR, is only there so a user can access this script, run the 
script, then remove the constant (as the script instructs).

Your suggestion appears to be to validate the logged-in user. But because this 
script is to fix a *corrupt database,* we would have no way of authenticating 
users. Thus, the script is instead secured by a temporary configuration change.

Aris mentions he experienced corruption in his own WordPress setup. It's most 
likely the options table simply crashed, not as a result of any particular 
exploit. This is, after all, why MySQL has a REPAIR command (and why we have a 
script for users to use).

I have read to quite a few of your "attacks" against WordPress core, but I 
don't recall ever reading a valid one.

Perhaps for WordPress issues you should switch from "full disclosure" to a more 
responsible course of action, such as contacting us first 
(security@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) so we can evaluate it. I understand the general appeal 
of full disclosure, but when all you're doing is publishing invalid 
vulnerabilities, it's only spreading FUD and also making it tough for others to 
take any of your "attacks" seriously. This mailing list would probably 
appreciate the higher signal-to-noise ratio.

Regards,

Andrew Nacin
Lead Developer
WordPress
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/