On Sun, Dec 08 2013, Anonymous wrote: >> > GSM firmware is still not open-source though (as that would make >> > phone not suitable for legal usage in USA) >> I'd like to see a law link that says you cannot legally use your own >> open source GSM compliant stack to communicate over a GSM network. > Since the GSM f/w controls a radio, and thus the power, it may need a > FCC certification. In which case you would need someone to finance > the certification every time a new version of the Gnu firmware is > released (FSF perhaps?). You cannot sell a radio into the consumer market that's easily modified to operate outside its certification. This has been the major stumbling block preventing fully open source wifi drivers for Atheros chips - the power and frequency can be set arbitrarily by the driver. Forget doing this in any legal fashion, because the law in most countries doesn't let consumers have the ability to operate radios outside of their certification limits, and there are no GSM radios that I'm aware of that enforce these limits in hardware. On the other hand, and seemingly contradicting what I just said, cheap software-defined radios such as the HackRF are coming onto the market. My suspicion is that the legislation simply hasn't caught up to this reality yet and that these will become difficult to obtain. But that will quickly become irrelevant, because they are open source designs, so anyone will be able to build one. The most challenging part will likely be the RF transmission components, which are generally integrated blocks and will probably also end up being controlled. Good luck trying to stop these from getting shipped into the US from China, though. It's still pretty easy for consumers to get their hands on ham radios because widespread abuse has never been a problem. If open source GSM remains in the hands of a few experimenters, we're probably safe. But if it ever starts getting used on a large scale, I would expect to see legislation trying to restrict access to the components. Perhaps by then it will be too late, though. I'd say our best bet is definitely cheap SDR peripherals like HackRF, though. Dedicated GSM chipsets are a pipe dream if you want transparency and control. -- Sean Richard Lynch <seanl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.literati.org/~seanl/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/